4.6 Article

Modeling the chiral resolution ability of highly sulfated β-cyclodextrin for basic compounds in electrokinetic chromatography

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1308, 期 -, 页码 152-160

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.08.003

关键词

Electrokinetic chromatography; Highly sulfated beta-cyclodextrin; Enantioresolution; Quantitative structure-property relationships; Partial least squares

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education [AP2010-1984]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the fact that extensive research in the field of enantioseparations by capillary electrophoresis has been carried out, it is difficult to predict whether a concrete chiral selector would be useful for the separation of a racemic compound. Hence, several experimental effort is necessary to test the abilities of individual chiral selectors, usually by trial and error procedures. Thus, the enantioseparation of a new racemate becomes a time- and money-consuming task. In this work, the ability of highly sulfated beta-cyclodextrin (HS-beta-CD) as chiral selector in electrokinetic chromatography (EKC) is modeled for the first time, using exclusively directly-available structural data of forty compounds (structurally unrelated basic drugs and pesticides). A discriminant partial least squares (PLS)-based quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) approach is simplified, resulting in a consistent, predictive and descriptive model. It is converted into an explicit equation able to predict the enantioresolution level (Rs) of new compounds, from four structure properties available in an on-line open database: logarithm of octanol-water partition coefficient estimated at pH 7.4 (IgD), polar surface area (PSA), number of hydrogen bond donors (HBD) and acceptors (HBA). For the cases in which the model predicts good Rs only in concrete experimental conditions, a Box-Behnken experimental design is proposed for the fast PLS-based optimization of the most influential experimental variables: cyclodextrin concentration, temperature and pH. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据