4.6 Article

In-tube solid-phase microextraction with molecularly imprinted polymer to determine interferon alpha 2a in plasma sample by high performance liquid chromatography

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1318, 期 -, 页码 43-48

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.10.018

关键词

In-tube SPME; High performance liquid chromatography; Molecularly imprinted polymers; Interferon alpha 2a

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A molecularly imprinted sol-gel polymer (MIP) based on protein (biopharmaceutical) template with a mild template removal condition using protease was synthetized and evaluated as stationary phase for in-tube solid phase microextraction (in-tube SPME) of the interferon alpha 2a from plasma samples, followed by high performance liquid chromatography analysis with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FD). The developed MIP exhibited high selectivity for the analyte in a complex matrix. The in-tube SPME variables such as draw/eject cycles, draw/eject volume, and desorption conditions were optimized to establish the equilibrium conditions in a short time. The MIP in-tube SPME/HPLC-FD method presented linear response over a dynamic range of 8-300 ng mL(-1), with a correlation coefficient of 0.997. The interassay precision presented coefficient of variation lower than 9.2%, and accuracy values between 92% and 98%. The developed MIP performed as well as other selective interferon alpha 2a stationary phases (e.g., immunosorbent and restricted access material), with the advantage that it is robust, easy to handle and cheap to synthesize, in a addition to requiring smaller sample volume (50 mu L). Based on the analytical validation results, the proposed method (MIP in-tube SPME/HPLC-FD) can be a useful tool to determine interferon alpha 2a in plasma samples from patients receiving therapeutic dosages. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据