4.6 Article

Separation of four flavonoids from Rhodiola rosea by on-line combination of sample preparation and counter-current chromatography

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1306, 期 -, 页码 12-19

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.07.052

关键词

Dynamic ultrasonic-assisted and solid-phase extraction; Ionic liquids; HSCCC; Rhodiola rosea; Flavonoids

资金

  1. Jiangnan University Science Research Projects [JUSRP211A32]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purification of four flavonoids from Rhodiola rosea was developed by on-line combination of sample preparation and counter-current chromatography (CCC). Flavonoid sample was prepared by dynamic ultrasonic-assisted and solid-phase extraction using ion liquids as extractant. The preparation conditions were optimized by D-optimal design as follows: 2 mol/L of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide concentration, 360W of ultrasonic power, 1.5 mL/min of flow rate, 35 min of extraction time and 0.5 mL (absorbent) per g (material) of absorbent amount. The prepared sample solution (20 mL) was loaded and injected directly into CCC column for final separation. As a result, four flavonoids, herbacetin-3-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl-7-O-alpha-L-rhamnopyranoside 1 (40.1 mg), kaempferol-3-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl-7-O-alpha-L-rhamn-opyranoside 2 (4.6 mg), kaempferol 3-O-beta-D-glucopyranoside-(2 -> 1)-beta-D-xylopyranoside 3 (20.2 mg) and herbacetin-8-O-beta-D-glucopyranoside 4 (22.5 mg), were obtained from 20 g of R. rosea material using ethyl acetate-n-butanol-H2O as solvent system at a ratio of 4:1:5 by CCC. Their structures were identified by ESI-MS/MS, NMR methods. Their purities determined by UPLC were 98.5%, 95.4%, 98.1% and 97.5%, respectively. Kaempferol-3-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl-7-O-alpha-L-rhamnopyranoside 2 and herbacetin-8-O-beta-D-glucopyrano-side 4 were isolated for first time from R. rosea. The purification method was simple, efficient and evaded tedious sample preparation process. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据