4.6 Article

Preparation of porous polymer monolithic column incorporated with graphene nanosheets for solid phase microextraction and enrichment of glucocorticoids

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1253, 期 -, 页码 22-31

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.07.003

关键词

Polymer monolithic column; Graphene; Solid phase microextraction; Glucocorticoids

资金

  1. Jilin Provincial Science & Technology Department [201105102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel monolithic capillary columns with embedded graphene were developed and used for polymer monolith microextraction (PMME) coupled to LC-MS analysis. The column was prepared inside fused silica capillaries (320 mu m, i.d.) using thermally initiated free-radical polymerization with butyl methacrylate (BMA) as monomer, ethylene dimethacrylate (EDMA) as cross-linker, and 1,4-butanediol and 1-propanol as porogens. Graphene (GN) was incorporated into the poly(BMA-EDMA) monolith to enhance the loading capacity. The obtained GN and the poly(BMA-EDMA-GN) monolith were characterized by transmission electron microscope (TEM), atomic force microscopic (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The extraction performance of the monolithic column was evaluated by glucocorticoids (GCs) as the analytes. The operation parameters of PMME including desorption solvent, sample flow rate, sample volume, sample pH, and eluent flow rate were studied and optimized. When compared to the parent poly(BMA-EDMA) column and direct sample analysis, high enrichment capacity was observed in the case of GN-entrapped monolith. The GN incorporated monolithic capillary showed satisfactory reusability and stability during extraction. The limits of detection (S/N = 3) for nine GCs were in the range of 0.13-1.93 ng/mL. Relative standard deviations for the determination of the target GCs were less than 14.5%. Finally, the PMME method, based on the developed monolithic capillary as the extraction media, was successfully applied to the determination of nine GCs in cosmetics. The recoveries of GCs spiked in different matrices ranged from 83.7% to 103.8%. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据