4.6 Article

Hydrosilated silica-based columns: The effects of mobile phase and temperature on dual hydrophilic-reversed-phase separation mechanism of phenolic acids

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1228, 期 -, 页码 125-134

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.06.077

关键词

Hydrosilated silica; HILIC; Temperature effects; Mobile phase; Phenolic acids

资金

  1. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [203/07/0641]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [253100002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of mobile phase composition and of temperature on the retention behavior of phenolic acids were studied on 4 hydrosilated (type C silica) based columns in buffered aqueous acetonitrile, both in the aqueous normal phase (HILIC) and in the reversed-phase mobile phase range. The UDC cholesterol and the C-18 bidentate columns show significant reversed phase and normal-phase retention mechanisms, whereas very weak retention in the reversed-phase mode was observed on the silica hydride and the Diamond hydride columns. The concentration effects of the aqueous acetate buffer over the full mobile phase (HILIC and RP) composition range can be described by a simple four-parameter equation. At increasing temperature, the retention times and peak widths decrease both in the aqueous normal phase and in the reversed phase mobile phase range. Linear van't Hoff log k versus 1/T plots were observed, indicating a single retention mechanism predominating in the highly organic (HILIC), like in highly aqueous (RP) mobile phase ranges. Besides the type of the stationary phase, the separation selectivity of phenolic acids strongly depends on temperature and on the mobile phase composition. From among the 4 hydrosilated columns compared in this work, the UDC cholesterol column has high temperature stability (up to 100 degrees C) and is most suitable for selective and efficient separations of phenolic acids both in the HILIC and in the RP modes. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据