4.6 Article

Zeolite imidazolate frameworks 8 as sorbent and its application to sonication-assisted emulsification microextraction combined with vortex-assisted porous membrane-protected micro-solid-phase extraction for fast analysis of acidic drugs in environmental water samples

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1257, 期 -, 页码 19-24

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.08.032

关键词

Zeolite imidazolate framework 8; Sonication-assisted emulsification microextraction combined with vortex-assisted porous membrane protected micro-solid-phase extraction; Acidic drugs

资金

  1. Singapore National Research Foundation
  2. National University of Singapore (NUS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel and fast procedure, sonication-assisted emulsification microextraction combined with vortex-assisted porous membrane protected micro-solid-phase extraction (SAEME-VA-mu-SPE), was developed for the gas chromatography-mass spectrometric determination of acidic drugs from environmental water samples. One advantage of the new procedure is that any solvent immiscible with water can be used as extractant solvent of SAEME and any solid sorbent can be used for mu-SPE in the SAEME-VA-mu-SPE process. In the present work, zeolite imidazolate framework 8 (ZIF-8) was employed as extraction six-bent for mu-SPE and 1-octanol as extractant solvent for SAEME. ZIF-8 has very good thermal, chemical and water stability, which make it a suitable material for the extraction of trace analytes from aqueous samples. Under the optimized extraction conditions, the developed method exhibited low limits of detection (0.01-0.04 ng/ml), good linearity (with r(2) between 0.9965 and 0.9993) from 0.5 to 50 ng/ml and satisfactory repeatability (between 4.1% and 7.6%). In essence SAEME-VA-mu-SPE is a combination of two different and efficient miniaturized techniques. It was demonstrated to be a fast, accurate, and convenient pretreatment procedure for trace analysis of environmental water samples. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据