4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Optimization of comprehensive two-dimensional gradient chromatography coupling in-line hydrophilic interaction and reversed phase liquid chromatography

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1268, 期 -, 页码 91-101

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.10.041

关键词

Two-dimensional liquid chromatography; HILIC; Column selectivity; Gradient elution; Phenolic compounds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In-line coupled comprehensive HILICxRP systems should offer larger selectivity differences and better two-dimensional orthogonality than coupled RPxRP systems. However, this may not apply for all systems. The HILIC selectivity depends on the mix of selective polar and non-polar interactions with the functional groups, but also with the matrix of polar columns and depends on the sample type. We synthesized a new polar monolithic sulfobetaine polymethacrylate capillary column with excellent efficiency for low-molecular compounds. When used in the first, HILIC dimension coupled to core-shell or monolithic RP columns in the second dimension, this column provides much improved orthogonality for two-dimensional separations of phenolic and flavonoid compounds, in comparison to silica-bonded Diol, Polyethylene glycol or Zwitterionic columns. We investigated the performance of 11 short 5 cm and 3 cm columns for fast (1-2 min) gradient second-dimension separations. Band broadening or distortion may occur in directly coupled comprehensive HILICxRP systems, due to strong solvent-strength differences between the mobile phases used in the first and in the second dimension. To suppress this effect, low fraction volumes were collected from a 0.5 mm I.D. capillary monolithic sulfobetaine column at the flow-rate of a few microliters per min, coupled in-line with various core-shell columns operated at the maximum flow-rate. This setup with simultaneous gradient elution in the HILIC and in the RP dimension provided successful separation of natural antioxidants. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据