4.6 Article

Group-selective enrichment and determination of pyrethroid insecticides in aquaculture seawater via molecularly imprinted solid phase extraction coupled with gas chromatography-electron capture detection

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1227, 期 -, 页码 60-66

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.01.012

关键词

Molecularly imprinted polymers; Pyrethroid insecticides; Gas chromatography-electron capture detection; Solid phase extraction

资金

  1. Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau [2009C50028]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31001139]
  3. Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2010C33054]
  4. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20103305120001]
  5. Ningbo University [xkl11101]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo [2009A610146]
  7. Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two types of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for the simultaneous determination of six pyrethroid insecticides have been developed using deltamethrin (D-MIPs) and cypermethrin (C-MIPs) as template molecules. A comparison of the performance of D-MIPs, C-MIPs, and the corresponding non-imprinted polymers (NIPs) were conducted. Stronger group-selective interactions between the C-MIPs and the six pyrethroid insecticides were achieved. The MISPE method based on the C-MIPs displayed higher extraction recoveries (86.4-96.0%) with RSD values ranging from 2.4 to 7.8% for the six pyrethroid insecticides in aquaculture seawater. After the C-MIP cartridge procedure, the limits of detection and quantification for fenvalerate, deltamethrin, cypermethrin, cyfluthrin, and bifenthrin were in the 16.6-37.0 and 55.3-109.1 ng L-1 ranges, respectively, and 0.68 and 2.26 mu g L-1 for phenothrin, respectively. The proposed MISPE method coupled with gas chromatography-electron capture detection was successfully used for the determination of the six pyrethroid insecticides in aquaculture seawater. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据