4.6 Article

Multipesticide residue analysis in maize combining acetonitrile-based extraction with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1218, 期 43, 页码 7748-7757

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.08.066

关键词

Pesticides; Maize; Cereals; QuEChERS; DLLME; GC-MS

资金

  1. FCT [PTDC/AGR-ALI/101583/2008]
  2. COMPETE FSE/FEDER/OE
  3. Subprograma Ciencia e Tecnologia do 3 Quadro Comunitario de Apoio [SFRH/BPD/41854/2007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A fast and simple gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method for determination of forty-one pesticide residues in maize is introduced. The sample preparation involves liquid-liquid partitioning with acetonitrile in presence of anhydrous MgSO4 and NaCl (QuEChERS) followed by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) using carbon tetrachloride as extractive solvent and the extract obtained by QuEChERS as dispersive solvent. The main factors influencing DLLME efficiency including extractive solvent type and volume as well as the volume of dispersive solvent were evaluated in this study. The DLLME procedure effectively provides an enrichment of the extract and a cleanup of certain polar matrix components, which can maximize the sensitivity when a single quadrupole MS is used. For validation purposes, recoveries studies were carried out at two concentration levels, yielding recovery rates in the range 70-120% for 82% of the analytes. A good linearity and precision, with relative standard deviations generally below 20% were obtained for all forty-one pesticides. The limits of detection obtained were lower than 19 mu g kg(-1) for more than 63% of the analytes. In two of a total of ten samples of maize, residues of lindane, tefluthrin, pirimicarb, folpet and bifenthrin were found, although at levels below the maximum limit established for this kind of samples. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据