4.6 Article

Effect of reaction solvent on the preparation of thermo-responsive stationary phase through a surface initiated atom transfer radical polymerization

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1218, 期 48, 页码 8617-8628

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.09.082

关键词

Thermo-responsive polymer; Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide); Atom transfer radical polymerization; Polymer brush; Reaction solvent

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Science (NIES)
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [20300169]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21390012, 20300169] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PIPAAm) brush grafted silica beads, a thermo-responsive chromatographic stationary phase, were prepared through a surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) using 2-propanol, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), and water as reaction solvents. The rate of grafting PIPAAm on silica bead surfaces was different and found to be dependent on the reactivity of reaction solvent. Temperature-dependent elution profiles of hydrophobic steroids from the prepared-beads-packed columns were found to be different, although the graft amounts of PIPAAm were similar on silica bead surfaces. Especially, prepared beads using 2-propanol exhibited a higher resolution than those using DMF. Calibration curves using glucose and pullulan suggested that beads prepared using DMF prohibited analytes to diffuse into the pores. On the contrary, beads prepared using 2-propanol allowed analytes to diffuse into the pores. The pore diameter of the prepared beads, measured by N(2) adsorption-desorption measurement, suggested that beads using 2-propanol has relatively larger pore diameter than those using DMF. Thus, the reaction solvent in surfaces-initiated ATRP affected the grafting configuration of PIPAAm on porous silica-bead surfaces, leading to the different separation efficiency of stationary phase for bioactive compounds. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据