4.6 Article

Highly sensitive detection of S-nitrosylated proteins by capillary gel electrophoresis with laser induced fluorescence

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1218, 期 38, 页码 6756-6762

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.07.062

关键词

S-nitrosylation; Fluorescence switch assay; CGE-LIF; Alzheimer's disease transgenic mice model

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK44510]
  2. National Center for Research Resources [P20RR016456]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

S-nitrosylated proteins are biomarkers of oxidative damage in aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here, we report a new method for detecting and quantifying nitrosylated proteins by capillary gel electrophoresis with laser induced fluorescence detection (CGE-LIF). Dylight 488 maleimide was used to specifically label thiol group (SH) after switching the S-nitrosothiol (S-NO) to SH in cysteine using the fluorescence switch assay. In vitro nitrosylation model-BSA subjected to S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) optimized the labeling reactions and characterized the response of the LIF detector. The method proves to be highly sensitive, detecting 1.3 picomolar (pM) concentration of nitrosothiols in nanograms of proteins, which is the lowest limit of detection of nitrosothiols reported to date. We further demonstrated the direct application of this method in monitoring protein nitrosylation damage in MQ mediated human colon adenocarcinoma cells. The nitrosothiol amounts in MQ treated and untreated cells are 14.8 +/- 0.2 and 10.4 +/- 0.5 pmol/mg of proteins, respectively. We also depicted nitrosylated protein electrophoretic profiles of brain cerebrum of 5-month-old AD transgenic (Tg) mice model. In Tg mice brain, 15.5 +/- 0.4 pmol of nitrosothiols/mg of proteins was quantified while wild type contained 11.7 +/- 0.3 pmol/mg proteins. The methodology is validated to quantify low levels of S-nitrosylated protein in complex protein mixtures from both physiological and pathological conditions. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据