4.6 Article

Poly(divinylbenzene-alkyl methacrylate) monolithic stationary phases in capillary electrochromatography

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1217, 期 37, 页码 5839-5847

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.07.050

关键词

pi-pi interaction; Polystyrene-based monolithic stationary; phase; Capillary electrochromatography; Alkyl methacrylate

资金

  1. NSC-98-2113-M-033-004-MY3 [National Science Council of Taiwan]
  2. Chung Yuan Christian University, Taiwan [CYCU-98-CR-CH]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a series of poly(divinylbenzene-alkyl methacrylate) monolithic stationary phases, which were prepared by single step in situ polymerization of divinylbenzene and various alkyl methacry-lates (butyl-, octyl-, or lauryl-methacrylate), were developed as separation columns of benzophenone compounds for capillary electrochromatography (CEC). In addition to the presence of plenty of benzene moieties, the stationary phases contained long and flexible alkyl groups on the surface. With an increase in the molecular length of alkyl methacrylate, the polymeric monolith, which had higher hydrophobicity, effectively reduced the peak tailing of benzophenones, but a weaker retention was observed. The unusual phenomenon was likely due to the pi-pi interaction between the aromatic compound and the polymeric material. The usage of longer alkyl methacrylate as reaction monomer limited the retention of aromatic compounds on the stationary phase surface, thus the pi-pi interaction between them was possibly reduced. Consequently, the retention time of aromatic compounds was markedly decreased with an increase in carbon length of alkyl methacrylate that was carried on the polymeric monolith. Compared to previous reports on polystyrene-based columns in which the peak-tailing problem was reduced by decreasing the benzene moieties on the stationary phase, this study demonstrated that the undesirable retention (peak-tailing) could also be improved by the inclusion of long alkyl methacrylate to the polystyrene-based columns. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据