4.6 Article

The performance of hybrid monolithic silica capillary columns prepared by changing feed ratios of tetramethoxysilane and methyltrimethoxysilane

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1217, 期 1, 页码 89-98

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.11.019

关键词

Monolithic silica column; High column efficiency; Methyltrimethoxysilane; Permeability; Selectivity; Size exclusion chromatography

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Sports, Culture, Science and Technology [17350036, 20350036]
  2. JLU Giessen
  3. Nacalai-Tesque
  4. GL Sciences
  5. Merck KGaA
  6. Darmstadt

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of a feed ratio of methyltrimethoxysilane (MTMS) to tetramethoxysilane (TMOS) was studied to improve the performance of a hybrid monolithic silica capillary column with 100-mu m i.d. in HPLC in a range MTMS/TMOS (v/v) = 10/90-25/75. The domain size was also varied by adjusting the amount of PEG to control permeability (K = 2.8 x 10(-14)-6.9 x 10(-14) m(2)). Evaluation of the performance for those capillary columns following octadecylsilylation proved an increase in retention factor (k) and a decrease in steric selectivity alpha(triphenylene/ortho-terphenyl) with the increase in MTMS content in the feed. The effect of the feed ratio was also observed in porosity and hydrophobic property of the C18 stationary phase from the results of size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and reversed phase characterization. The monolithic silica capillary columns prepared under new preparation conditions were able to produce a plate height of 4.6-6.0 mu m for hexylbenzene in a mobile phase acetonitrile/water=80/20 at a linear velocity of 2mm/s. Consequently, it was possible to prepare hybrid monolithic silica capillary columns with higher performance than those reported previously while maintaining the retention factors in a similar range by reducing the MTMS/TMOS ratio and increasing the total silane concentration in feed. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据