4.6 Article

Simultaneous determination of clenbuterol, salbutamol and ractopamine in milk by reversed-phase liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry with isotope dilution

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1217, 期 50, 页码 7873-7877

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.10.055

关键词

Clenbuterol; Sabutamol; Ractopamine; Milk; LC-MS/MS; Isotope dilution

资金

  1. National Science Fund of China [31072172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple, sensitive and reliable analytical method was developed for the simultaneous determination of clenbuterol (CLB), salbutamol (SAL) and ractopamine (RAC) in milk by ultra high performance liquid chromatography-positive electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS) with isotope dilution. Samples were directly purified through HLB cartridge. Then the eluate was dried under nitrogen and residues were redissolved in mobile phase. Samples were analyzed by LC-MS/MS on an Acquity UPLC (R) BEH C-18 column with gradient elution. The samples were quantified using clenbuterol-D-9, salbutamol-D-3 and ractopamine-D-6 as internal standards. The proposed method was validated according to the European Commission Decision 2002/657/EC determining specificity, decision limit (CC alpha), detection capability (CC beta), recovery, precision, linearity, robustness and stability. CC alpha values were 0.054, 0.006 and 0.008 mu g/kg for CLB, SAL and RAC, respectively. CC beta values were 0.058, 0.007 and 0.009 mu g/kg for CLB, SAL and RAC, respectively. The mean recoveries, repeatability (expressed as coefficient of variation. CVr), and reproducibility (CVR) varied from 95.8 to 106.2%, from 3.60 to 6.44% (CVr), and from 4.77 to 7.53% (CVR), respectively. The method is demonstrated to be suitable for the determination of clenbuterol, salbutamol and ractopamine in milk. The total time required for the analysis of one sample, including sample preparation, was about 45 min. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据