4.6 Article

The impact of sampling time on peak capacity and analysis speed in on-line comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1217, 期 36, 页码 5700-5709

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.07.009

关键词

2DLC; LC x LC; 2D on-line comprehensive chromatography; Multidimensional separations; Optimization; Peak capacity; Under-sampling; Re-equilibration; Cycle times; Sampling times; Peptides; Gradient elution; Isocratic elution

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM54585]
  2. U.S. Pharmacopeia
  3. American Chemical Society Division of Analytical Chemistry and Faculty
  4. Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation
  5. MacMod Analytical
  6. Agilent Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (2DLC) offers a number of practical advantages over optimized one-dimensional LC in peak capacity and thus in resolving power. The traditional product rule for overall peak capacity for a 2DLC system significantly overestimates peak capacity because it neglects under-sampling of the first dimension separation. Here we expand on previous work by more closely examining the effects of the first dimension peak capacity and gradient time, and the second dimension cycle times on the overall peak capacity of the 2DLC system. We also examine the effects of re-equilibration time on under-sampling as measured by the under-sampling factor and the influence of molecular type (peptide vs. small molecule) on peak capacity. We show that in fast 20 separations (less than 1 h), the second dimension is more important than the first dimension in determining overall peak capacity and conclude that extreme measures to enhance the first dimension peak capacity are usually unwarranted. We also examine the influence of sample types (small molecules vs. peptides) on second dimension peak capacity and peak capacity production rates, and how the sample type influences ptimum second dimension gradient and re-equilibration times. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据