4.6 Article

Intact-protein trapping columns for proteomic analysis in capillary high-performance liquid chromatography

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1217, 期 44, 页码 6875-6881

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.08.051

关键词

Monolithic trapping column; Chromatography; Intact proteins; Sol-gel

资金

  1. National Basic Research Priorities Program [2007CB914100/3]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2006AA02A308]
  3. National Key Natural Science Foundation of China [20705006]
  4. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new type of monolithic trapping columns with high mechanical strength was prepared by thin-layer sol-gel coating method and applied to trapping intact proteins for on-line capillary liquid chromatography. Monolithic trapping columns were fabricated by entrapping C8 reversed-phase particles into the capillary columns through a sot-gel network, which was formed by hydrolysis and polycondensation of methyltriethoxysilane. Hundreds times of trapping/untrapping for intact proteins were carried out. The trapping columns showed long-term stability up to 300 bar. Recovery, loading capacity and reproducibility of trapping columns were evaluated using four proteins. The recovery of four protein mixtures for the C8 monolithic trapping columns was 99.3% on average. The loading capacity of 5 mm x 320 mu m i.d. C8 trapping columns for the protein mixtures was 30 mu g. Day-to-day relative standard deviation (RSD) values for recoveries of protein mixtures on the same C8 trapping column ranged from 2.34 to 5.87%, column-to-column RSD values were from 3.01 to 6.81%. The C8 trapping columns were used to trap normal mouse liver intact proteins in a capillary liquid chromatography system. Results demonstrated high efficiency of the monolithic trapping columns for trapping intact proteins for proteomic analysis in on-line capillary liquid chromatography system. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据