4.6 Article

Quantification of phosphorus in DNA using capillary electrophoresis hyphenated with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1217, 期 50, 页码 7921-7925

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.10.066

关键词

DNA; Phosphorus; Quantification; Capillary electrophoresis; Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [21550094]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21550094] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have analyzed phosphorus in an enzymatically digested DNA molecule using capillary electrophoresis (CE) hyphenated with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The DNA concentration was quantified by the phosphorus value obtained in the CE-ICP-MS analysis. The CE-ICP-MS measurement, for which the interface device AIF-01 equipped three layered nebulizer was adopted, was achieved with limited mu L/min nebulizing without loss of sample in the vaporizing chamber. The samples of nucleotides and free phosphate were separated well in the CE-ICP-MS measurement, and the calibration curve (0.1-10 mu g/mL) of the phosphorus showed a linear (R(2) = 0.999) increase in intensity. After digestion of the 100-bp double-strand DNA sample to deoxyribonucleotide-5'-monophosphates (dNMPs) by phosphodiesterase-I, phosphorus was detected by CE-ICP-MS without further purification steps. In this study, we applied two calculation schemes of DNA analysis using a dNMP concentration obtained from CE-ICP-MS. Comparative CE-ICP-MS analysis with DNA digested to dNMPs showed that the assay gave an equal value obtained from the total DNA quantification using fluorescence detection. The detection limits of the DNA sample obtained from these species and phosphorus in nucleotides using CE-ICP-MS were 3.1-26 ng/m L. These LOD values were equal to the conventional fluorescence determination of DNA. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据