4.6 Article

Simultaneous determination of 15 steroidal oral contraceptives in water using solid-phase disk extraction followed by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1216, 期 28, 页码 5416-5423

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.05.041

关键词

Steroidal hormone; Water analysis; UPLC-MS/MS; Solid-phase disk extraction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20728505]
  2. Sino-German Center for Research Promotion
  3. DFG
  4. NSFC [GZ364]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A rapid, accurate and sensitive method for simultaneous determination of 15 steroidal hormones including four estrogens (estrone, 17 beta-estradiol, 17 alpha-ethynylestradiol, estriol) and eleven progestogens (17 beta-estradiol-3-benzoate, 19-norethindrone, gestodene. levonorgestrel, medroxyprogesterone, cyproterone acetate, megestrol-17-acetate, progesterone, norethindrone acetate, chlormadinone-17-acetate, and hydroxy progesterone caproate) in environmental waters was developed by coupling solid-phase disk extraction (SPDE) to ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) with electrospray ionization. Among three types of extraction tested (C-8 SPDE, C-18 SPDE and C-18 SPE), the most satisfactory result was achieved using C-18 SPDE for its satisfactory recovery (75.6 to 101.4%) and short extraction time (15 min for 1 L deionised water). The validity of this method was investigated and good analytical performance for all the analytes was obtained, including low limits of method detection (0.5-3.4 ng/L) and excellent linear dynamic range (1.0-50.0 ng/L). The method was applied to determine the steroidal hormones in 10 environmental waters including tap water, river water, lake water and waste water in Beijing. No progestogen was detected in all samples and estrone, estriol, 17 alpha-ethynylestradiol were found in most samples at levels between 1.8 and 127.9 ng/L. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据