4.6 Article

Determination of 3-nitroaniline in water samples by directly suspended droplet three-phase liquid-phase microextraction using 18-crown-6 ether and high-performance liquid chromatography

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1216, 期 26, 页码 5086-5091

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.04.090

关键词

Liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction (LLLME); Directly suspended droplet; 3-Nitroaniline; Water analysis

资金

  1. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction (LLLME) with directly suspended droplet in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has been applied as a new, rapid and easy method for the determination of 3-nitroaniline in environmental water samples. The target compound was extracted from the aqueous sample solution (donor phase, pH 13) into an organic phase and then was back-extracted into a directly suspended droplet of ail acidic aqueous solution (acceptor phase, pH 0.3). In this method, without using a microsyringe as supporting device, an aqueous large droplet is freely suspended at the top-center position of an immiscible organic solvent, which is laid over the aqueous sample solution while being agitated. Then, the droplet was withdrawn into the microsyringe and directly was injected into the HPLC system with UV detection at 227 nm. Up to 148-fold enrichment of the analyte could be obtained under the optimal conditions [i.e. donor phase: 0.1 M sodium hydroxide solution (4.5 mL); organic phase: o-xylene/1-octanol (90:10, v/v; 250 mu L); acceptor phase: 0.5 M hydrochloric acid and 500 mM 18-crown-6 ether (6 mu L); extraction time: 60 s; back-extraction time: 6 min and stirring rate: 600 rpm]. The limit of detection was 1 mu g/L (n=7) and the relative standard deviation (RSD, n=5) was 4.9 at S/N=3. The calibration graph was linear in the range of 5-1500 mu g/L with r=0.9983. All experiments were carried out at room temperature (22 +/- 0.5 degrees C). (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据