4.6 Article

Investigation of enantiomer recognition of molecularly imprinted polymeric monoliths in pressurized capillary electrochromatography screening the amino acids and their derivatives

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1216, 期 27, 页码 5320-5326

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.05.012

关键词

Enantiomer separation; Molecular imprinting; Monolithic column; Pressurized capillary electrochromatography; Recognition mechanism

资金

  1. National High-Tech RD Program [2006AA09z161]
  2. National Key Technologies RD Program [2006BAK02A21]
  3. Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2007J0129]
  4. Key Science & Technology Project of Jujian Province [2007Y0062, 2008Y0301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecularly imprinted monolithic columns were prepared for chiral separation of tyrosine and its amino acid derivatives by in situ therm-initiated copolymerization of methacrylic acid, 4-vinylpyridine and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate. The enantiomers were rapidly separated on monolithic columns in less than 10 min by pressurized capillary electrochromatography (pCEC). The influences of several parameters such as the content of cross-linking monomer on the composition of the pre-polymerization mixture were systematically investigated. The influence of the pCEC conditions including the composition of the mobile phase was also optimized to obtain the good enantioseparation. It was found that in addition to molecularly imprinted recognition, chromatographic retention and electrophoretic migration play important roles in the retention and chiral recognition of molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) columns. The cross-selectivity for similar amino acids and its derivatives were systematical investigated for understanding the recognition mechanism on the MIP monolithic columns. The results indicated that molecularly imprinted polymer recognizes the template molecule by its molecular shape defined binding cavity. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据