4.6 Article

Development of core-shell structure Fe3O4@Ta2O5 microspheres for selective enrichment of phosphopeptides for mass spectrometry analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1216, 期 29, 页码 5533-5539

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.05.049

关键词

Fe3O4@Ta2O5; Magnetic microspheres; Phosphopeptides; Selective enrichment; Mass spectrometry

资金

  1. National Basic Research Priorities Program [2007CB914100/3]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20875017, 30873132]
  3. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline [B109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein phosphorylation is one of the most important post-translational modifications. Due to the dynamic nature and low stoichiometry of the protein phosphorylation, enrichment of phosphopeptides from proteolytic mixtures is often necessary prior to their characterization by mass spectrometry. Many metal oxides Such as titanium dioxide and zirconium dioxide have been Successfully applied to isolation and enrichment of phosphopeptides. Recently. niobium pentoxide was proved to have the ability for selective enrichment of phosphopeptides. Considering the proximity of tantalum to niobium, we Supposed that Ta2O5 can be Used as affinity probes for phosphopeptide enrichment. In the work, we synthesized Fe3O4@Ta2O5 magnetic microspheres with core-shell structure for selective enrichment of phosphopeptides. To demonstrate its ability for selective enrichment of phosphopeptides, we applied Fe3O4@Ta2O5 magnetic microspheres to isolation and enrichment of the phosphopeptides from tryptic digestion of standard proteins and real samples, and then the enriched peptides were analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption mass spectrometry analysis (MALDI-MS) or liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS). Experiment results demonstrate that Ta2O5 coated-magnetic microspheres show the excellent potential for selective enrichment of phosphopeptides. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据