4.6 Article

Selectivity comparisons of monolithic silica capillary columns modified with poly(octadecyl methacrylate) and octadecyl moieties for halogenated compounds in reversed-phase liquid chromatography

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1216, 期 31, 页码 5868-5874

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.06.030

关键词

Halogenated compounds; Selectivity; Reversed-phase HPLC; Monolithic silica capillary columns

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund [RMU5080054]
  2. Royal Golden jubilee Ph.D. Program [PHDO0252550]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [20350036]
  4. postdoctoral fellowship [P07337]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20350036] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stationary phase selectivities for halogenated compounds in reversed-phase HPLC were compared using C18 monolithic silica capillary columns modified with poly(octadecyl methacrylate) (ODM) and octadecyl moieties (ODS). The preferential retention of halogenated benzenes on ODM was observed in methanol/water and acetonitrile/water mobile phases. In selectivity comparison of selected analytes on ODM and ODS, greater selectivities for halogenated compounds were obtained with respect to alkylbenzenes on an ODM column, while similar selectivities were observed with a homologous series of alkylbenzenes on ODM and ODS columns. These data can be explained by greater dispersive interactions by more densely packed octadecyl groups on the ODM polymer coated column together with the contribution of carbonyl groups in ODM side chains. For the positional isomeric separation of dihalogenated benzenes (ortho, meta-, para-), the ODM column also provided better separation of these isomers for the adjacently eluted isomers that cannot be completely separated on an ODS column in the same mobile phase. These results imply that the ODM column can be used as a better alternative to the ODS column for the separation of other halogenated compounds. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据