4.6 Article

Development of negligible depletion hollow fiber membrane-protected liquid-phase microextraction for simultaneous determination of partitioning coefficients and acid dissociation constants

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1216, 期 12, 页码 2583-2586

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.01.092

关键词

Simultaneous determination; Partitioning coefficient; Acid dissociation constant; Hollow fiber membrane; Negligible depletion liquid-phase microextraction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method based on negligible depletion hollow fiber-protected liquid-phase microextraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was developed for the Simultaneous determination of partitioning coefficients (K-OW) and acid dissociation constants (pK(a)), by using phenol, 4-chlorophenol and 2.4-dichlorophenol as model compounds. A 37-mm length polypropylene hollow fiber membranes (600 mu m inner diameter, 200 mu m wall-thickness, 0.2 mu m pore size, similar to 70% porosity) with two-end sealed were filled with 1-octanol by ultrasonic agitation to prepare the extraction device. The extraction device was deployed in sample solutions, prepared by spiking target analytes in 1-octanol saturated aqueous solutions (500 mL), for negligible depletion extraction. After equilibrium was reached (similar to 5 h), the 1-octanol in the lumen of the hollow fiber membrane was collected for HPLC determination of the target analytes. As the depletion of the analytes in aqueous samples was negligible, the distribution coefficient (D-OW) could be calculated based on the measured equilibrium concentration in 1-octanol (C-O) and the initial concentration (C-w) in the aqueous sample of the target analyte (D-OW = C-O/C-W). The D-OW values measured at various pH values were nonlinearly regressed with pH to obtain the K-OW and pK(a) values of a compound. Results showed that the measured values of the K-OW and pK(a) of these model compounds agreed well with literature data. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据