4.6 Article

Utilization of solid-phase microextraction-high-performance liquid chromatography in the determination of aromatic analyte partitioning to imidazolium-based ionic liquid micelles

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1216, 期 6, 页码 948-955

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.12.017

关键词

Solid-phase microextraction; Ionic liquids; Micelles; High-performance liquid chromatography; Partition coefficients; Aromatic compounds

资金

  1. Analytical and Surface Chemistry Program
  2. Separation and Purification Process Program
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-0748612]
  4. University of Toledo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A solid-phase microextraction (SPME)-high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) approach is used, for the first time, to study the partitioning behavior of eight aromatic analytes to three imidazolium-based ionic liquid micelles, namely, 1-hexadecyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide (HDMIm-Br), 1-hexadecyl-3-butylimidazolium bromide (HDBIm-Br), and 1,3-didodecylimidazolium bromide (DDDDIm-Br). The model used to Calculate the partition coefficients is improved by determining the accurate critical micelle concentration (CMC) value of the studied IL-micelles, which considers the nature and amount of organic modifier used in the experiments. Proper CIVIC values in the model improve the quality of the results and decrease the differences between theoretical and experimental intercepts. Surface tensiometry has been utilized to determine the CMC values for the micelles at different acetonitrile contents (1% and 1.5%. v/v). The calculated partition coefficient values for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) oscillate between 631 and 5980, whereas aromatic analytes with a lower number of fused rings in their structures suffer non-partitioning to any of the IL-micelles. The obtained partition coefficients to IL-micelles were highest with the DDDDIm-Br IL and were always higher than those obtained with the traditional surfactant cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB). (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据