4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Preparative isolation and purification of isobenzofuranone derivatives and saponins from seeds of Nigella glandulifera Freyn by high-speed counter-current chromatography combined with gel filtration

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1216, 期 19, 页码 4258-4262

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.03.050

关键词

High-speed counter-current chromatography; Nigella glandulifera Freyn; Seeds; Isobenzofuranone; Salfredin B11

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the medicinal plant and food Nigella glandulifera Freyn has been researched for decades, isobenzofuranones have never been isolated before. Two isobenzofuranone derivatives and two saponins were Successfully separated and Purified from seeds of N. glandulifera Freyn by high-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCCC) with the optimized two-phase solvent system, n-hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water (7:3:5:5, v/v). Salfredin B-11 (22.1 mg, HPLC Purity 95.3%), 5, 7-dihydroxy-6-(3-methybut-2-enyl) isobenzofuran-1(3H)-one (18.9 mg, HPLC purity 97.3%) and crude sample 2 (555 mg) were separated from 600 mg of ethyl acetate extract of N. glandulifera Freyn. Following a cleaning-up step by chromatography on Sephadex LH-20, hederagenin (12 mg) and 3-O-[beta-D-xylopyranosyl-(1 -> 3)-alpha-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 -> 2)-alpha-L-arabinopyranosyl]-hederagen in (45 mg) were separated from sample 2. All of the fractions before peak 11 were collected and Subjected to a Sephadex LH-20 column and eluted by methanol, two of triterpene saponins (12 mg of hederagenin and 45 mg of 3-O-[beta-D-xylopyranosyl-(1 -> 3)-alpha-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 -> 2)-alpha-L-arabinopyranosyl]-hederagenin) were isolated. The structures of peak fractions were identified by IR, electron ionization MS. H-1 NMR and C-13 NMR. 5, 7-Dihydroxy-6-(3-methybut-2-enyl) isobenzofuran-1(3H)-one was isolated for the first time from higher plant and salfredin B11 was isolated for the first time in this plant. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据