4.6 Article

Ultrasound-assisted ionic liquid dispersive liquid-phase micro-extraction: A novel approach for the sensitive determination of aromatic amines in water samples

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1216, 期 20, 页码 4361-4365

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.03.046

关键词

Ultrasound-assisted ionic liquid dispersive liquid-phase micro-extraction; Ionic liquid; Aromatic amines

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [020877022]
  2. High-Tech Research & Development Planning (863 Plan) of P.R. China [2006AA06Z424]
  3. Personal Innovation Foundation of Universities in Henan Province [[2005]126]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province [082102350022]
  5. Fund of Henan Normal University [2006PL06]
  6. Henan Key Laboratory for environmental pollution control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrasound-assisted ionic liquid dispersive liquid-phase micro-extraction was developed for the determination of four aromatic amines such as 2,4-dichloroaniline, 1-naphthylamine, 6-chloroanline and N,N-dimethylaniline. High-performance liquid chromatography coupled with UV detector was used for the determination of aromatic amines. In the novel procedure, 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate [C6MIM] [PF6] was dispersed into the aqueous sample solution as fine droplets by ultrasonication, and which promoted the analytes more easily migrate into the ionic liquid phase. Variable affecting such as the volume of [C6MIM] [PF6], sample pH, ultrasonication time, extraction time, centrifuging time have been investigated in detail. The proposed method has been found to have excellent detection sensitivity with limits of detection (LOD, S/N =3) in the range of 0.17-0.49 mu g L-1 and precisions in the range of 2.0-6.1% (RSDs, n=6). This method has been also successfully applied to analyze the real water samples and good spiked recoveries over the range of 92.2-119.3% were obtained. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据