4.6 Article

Trace analysis of quinolone and fluoroquinolone antibiotics from wastewaters by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1214, 期 1-2, 页码 100-108

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.10.090

关键词

Quinolone and fluoroquinolone antibiotics; Environmental analysis; Matrix effects; WCX cartridge cleanup; LC-ESI-MS/MS

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20610103, 40632009]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology [2006DFA91130]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sensitive liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry method, combined with solid-phase extraction and a weak cation exchange cartridge cleanup, was established for twenty quinolone and fluoroquinolone antibiotics (pipemidic acid, flerofloxacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, enoxacin, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, enrofloxacin, lomefloxacin, difloxacin, sarafloxacin, gatifloxacin, sparfloxacin, moxifloxacin, cinoxacin, oxolinic acid, nalidixic acid, flumequine, and piromidic acid) in influent, effluent, and river waters. For the various water matrices considered, the overall recoveries were from 64% to 127% except for piromidic acid (27-33%), and no obvious matrix effect was observed. The method detection limits for the twenty target antibiotics in the influent, effluent, and surface water samples were 1.6-50 ng/L, 0.6-50 ng/L, and 0.8-50 ng/L, respectively. This method was applied to analyze residual quinolone and fluoroquinolone antibiotics in wastewater and surface water samples from Beijing, China. Eight antibiotics (12 (pipemidic acid)-1208 ng/L (ofloxacin)) were detected in wastewater, and seven (1.3 (lomefloxacin)-535 ng/L (ofloxacin)) were detected in surface water samples. Gatifloxacin, a 4th generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic, was detected for the first time in influent (111 ng/L), effluent (56 ng/L), and river water (16-42 ng/L). 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据