4.2 Article

Validated Chromatographic Methods for Simultaneous Determination of Tolfenamic Acid and Its Major Impurities

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHIC SCIENCE
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 484-491

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/bmu071

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two accurate, selective and precise chromatographic methods, namely thin-layer chromatography (TLC)-densitometric method and reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method, were developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of tolfenamic acid (TOL) and its two major impurities, 2-chlorobenzoic acid (CBA) and 3-chloro-2-methylaniline (CMA), which are also reported to be its related substances. The developed TLC-densitometric method depended on separation and quantitation of the studied drugs on silica gel 60F(254) TLC plates. Hexane: chloroform: acetone: acetic acid (75: 25: 20: 0.1, v/v/v/v) was used as a developing system and the separated bands were UV-scanned at 240 nm. Linear relationships were obtained in the range of 10-100 mu g band(-1) for the drug and in the range of 0.1-1 mu g band(-1) for the studied impurities. The developed RP-HPLC depended on chromatographic separation of the studied drugs on a C18 column using 0.05 M KH2PO4 buffer (pH 3): acetonitrile (45: 55, v/v) as a mobile phase delivered at constant flow rate of 1 mL min(-1) with UV detection at 230 nm. Calibration curves for TOL and the two impurities were constructed over the concentration ranges of 10-100 mu g mL(-1) for TOL and 0.01-0.1 mu g mL(-1) for both CBA and CMA. Factors affecting the developed methods have been studied and optimized. Further, methods validation has been carried out according to International Conference on Harmonization guidelines. The proposed methods were successfully applied for determination of the studied drug in its bulk powder and in pharmaceutical formulation. The methods showed no significant difference when compared with the reported RP-HPLC one. The developed methods have advantages of being more sensitive and specific than the published methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据