4.5 Article

The neural bases of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: An MEG study

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 176-189

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.011

关键词

Taxonomic concepts; Thematic concepts; MEG; Semantic memory; Anterior temporal lobe; Temporoparietal junction

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DGE-1342536, BCS-1128769]
  2. National Institute of Health [2R01DC05660]
  3. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1128769] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Converging evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging studies of human concepts indicate distinct neural systems for taxonomic and thematic knowledge. A recent study of naming in aphasia found involvement of the anterior temporal lobe (An) during taxonomic (feature-based) processing, and involvement of the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) during thematic (function-based) processing. We conducted an online magnetoencephalography (MEG) study to examine the spatio-temporal nature of taxonomic and thematic relations. We measured participants' brain responses to words preceded by either a taxonomically or thematically related item (e.g., cottage -> castle, king -> castle). In a separate experiment we collected relatedness ratings of the word pairs from participants. We examined effects of relatedness and relation type on activation in ATL and TPJ regions of interest (ROIs) using permutation t-tests to identify differences in ROI activation between conditions as well as single-trial correlational analyses to examine the millisecond-by-millisecond influence of the stimulus variables on the ROIs. Taxonomic relations strongly predicted An activation, and both kinds of relations influenced the TPJ. Our results further strengthen the view of the All's importance to taxonomic knowledge. Moreover, they provide a nuanced view of thematic relations as involving taxonomic knowledge. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据