4.5 Article

Group cognitive behavior therapy for children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders and anxiety: a randomized trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 410-419

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02486.x

关键词

Autism; anxiety; cognitive behavioral therapies; group

资金

  1. Cure Autism Now
  2. Autism Speaks
  3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, through the Administration on Developmental Disabilities [90DD0561]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are at high risk for developing significant anxiety. Anxiety can adversely impact functioning across school, home and community environments. Cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) are frequently used with success for children with anxiety symptoms. Modified CBT interventions for anxiety in children with ASD have also yielded promising results. Methods: Fifty children with high-functioning ASD and anxiety were randomized to group CBT or treatment-as-usual (TAU) for 12 weeks. Independent clinical evaluators, blind to condition, completed structured interviews (Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule -Parent Version; ADIS-P) pre-and post-intervention condition. Results: Forty-seven children completed either the CBT or TAU condition. Results indicated markedly better outcomes for the CBT group. Significant differences by group were noted in Clinician Severity Ratings, diagnostic status, and clinician ratings of global improvement. In the intent-to-treat sample, 10 of 20 children (50%) in the CBT group had a clinically meaningful positive treatment response, compared to 2 of 23 children (8.7%) in the TAU group. Conclusions: Initial results from this randomized, designed treatment study suggest that a group CBT intervention specifically developed for children with ASD may be effective in decreasing anxiety. Limitations of this study include small sample size, lack of an attention control group, and use of outcome measures normed with typically developing children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据