4.1 Article

Rationale for the Development of 2-Aminobenzamide Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors as Therapeutics for Friedreich Ataxia

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 1164-1173

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0883073812448533

关键词

chromatin immunoprecipitation; Friedreich ataxia; histone deacetylase inhibitor; heterochromatin; neurodegenerative disorder

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance
  4. GoFAR
  5. Ataxia UK
  6. Friedreich's Ataxia Society Ireland
  7. Muscular Dystrophy Association (Repligen Corporation)
  8. National Institutes of Health [2R13NS040925-14 Revised]
  9. National Institutes of Health Office of Rare Diseases Research
  10. Child Neurology Society
  11. National Ataxia Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerous studies have pointed to histone deacetylase inhibitors as potential therapeutics for various neurodegenerative diseases, and clinical trials with several histone deacetylase inhibitors have been performed or are under way. However, histone deacetylase inhibitors tested to date either are highly cytotoxic or have very low specificities for different histone deacetylase enzymes. The authors' laboratories have identified a novel class of histone deacetylase inhibitors (2-aminobenzamides) that reverses heterochromatin-mediated silencing of the frataxin (FXN) gene in Friedreich ataxia. The authors have identified the histone deacetylase enzyme isotype target of these compounds and present evidence that compounds that target this enzyme selectively increase FXN expression from pathogenic alleles. Studies with model compounds show that these histone deacetylase inhibitors increase FXN messenger RNA levels in the brain in mouse models for Friedreich ataxia and relieve neurological symptoms observed in mouse models and support the notion that this class of molecules may serve as therapeutics for the human disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据