4.5 Article

Oscillations in the human brain during walking execution, imagination and observation

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 223-232

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.039

关键词

Oscillations; EEG; fMRI; Motor control; Mental imagery; Walking; Review

资金

  1. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office
  2. European Space Agency, France [AO-2004,118]
  3. Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS)
  4. Universite Libre de Bruxelles
  5. Universite de Mons (Belgium)
  6. FEDER (BIOFACT)
  7. MINDWALKER Project by the European Commission, Belgium
  8. Secretaria Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (SENESCYT, Ecuador)
  9. Fonds G.Leibu
  10. NeuroAtt BIOWIN Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gait is an essential human activity which organizes many functional and cognitive behaviors. The bio-mechanical constraints of bipedalism implicating a permanent control of balance during gait are taken into account by a complex dialog between the cortical, subcortical and spinal networks. This networking is largely based on oscillatory coding, including changes in spectral power and phase-locking of ongoing neural activity in theta, alpha, beta and gamma frequency bands. This coding is specifically modulated in actual gait execution and representation, as well as in contexts of gait observation or imagination. A main challenge in integrative neuroscience oscillatory activity analysis is to disentangle the brain oscillations devoted to gait control. In addition to neuroimaging approaches, which have highlighted the structural components of an extended network, dynamic high-density EEG gives non-invasive access to functioning of this network. Here we revisit the neurophysiological foundations of behavior-related EEG in the light of current neuropsychological theoretic frameworks. We review different EEG rhythms emerging in the most informative paradigms relating to human gait and implications for rehabilitation strategies. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据