4.1 Article

Antipsychotic Medication Prescribing Trends in a Pediatric Population in Northern Poland 2008-2012

期刊

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/cap.2017.0154

关键词

children; adolescents; psychiatry; antipsychotic agents; prescription trends

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: In recent years antipsychotics have been increasingly used in the population of children and adolescents. The objective of this article is to profile the use of antipsychotic medications in a pediatric population in Poland based on data from the Pomeranian region (Northern Poland). Methods: The study was based on National Health Fund data about prescription drug reimbursement between 2008 and 2012. A patient database was created using ID to analyze specific patterns and information about individuals using antipsychotics. Percentage population indicators were calculated using official demographic reports. Results: An increased number of overall prescriptions was observed since 2008, with a subsequent decline to its lowest number in 2012. The population with at least one antipsychotic-filled prescription per year has grown in the same time. The annual rate has increased from 0.26% to 0.31% of the general population between 0 and 17 years of age in the Pomeranian region. We observed an increasing number of females and the 0- to 4-year-old receiving antipsychotic prescriptions. The population share of prescribed first-generation antipsychotics exceeded the share of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). The use of SGAs increased from 38% to 44% of all prescriptions, during the observation period. The most frequently prescribed drugs were Risperidone (26.7%) and Chlorprothixene (21.7%). Conclusions: The study revealed that the prescribing patterns of antipsychotics increased in the Polish pediatric population and concerned more patients from the youngest group. The high prevalence of such early exposure to antipsychotics should focus more attention on drug safety in this population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据