4.1 Article

Symptom Improvement and Residual Symptoms during Acute Antidepressant Treatment in Pediatric Major Depressive Disorder

期刊

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/cap.2009.0116

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [R01 MH39188]
  2. Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation
  3. Biobehavioral Diagnostics Inc.
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  5. Eli Lilly
  6. Forest Laboratories
  7. GlaxoSmithKline (formerly SmithKline Beecham)
  8. Norvartis
  9. Organon
  10. Repligen
  11. Shire Pharmaceuticals
  12. Somerset
  13. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Knowing the timing of specific depressive symptom improvement will enable clinicians to prepare their patients well and improve treatment outcome, whereas recognizing which depressive symptoms may show delayed improvement will help clinicians to provide additional interventions early in treatment. In a prospective open-label fluoxetine study, we investigated the timing of depressive symptom improvement during acute treatment, and identified common remaining symptoms following 4, 8, and 12 weeks of acute treatment in depressed youths. Method: A total of 168 children and adolescents, aged 7-18 years, with primary diagnoses of major depressive disorder (MDD) received 12 weeks of fluoxetine treatment. Youths were evaluated using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. The outcome measure included the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised. Results: All depressive symptoms improved, particularly during the first 4 weeks of acute treatment. Forty-seven percent of remitters reported at least one residual symptom following 12 weeks, with most common residual symptoms being impaired school performance, insomnia, and irritability. Conclusions: Residual symptoms are common, even among remitters, at the end of 12 weeks of acute treatment. There is a need for clinicians to monitor symptom improvement and potentially provide additional interventions for the more resistant symptoms, such as insomnia and school performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据