4.7 Article

A Multiscale Simulation Approach to Modeling Drug-Protein Binding Kinetics

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 6093-6101

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00687

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/M013898/1, EP/P022138/1, EP/M015378/1, EP/P011306/1]
  2. HEC-Biosim [EPSRC] [EP/L000253/1]
  3. CCPBioSim [EP/M022609/1]
  4. BBSRC [BB/M026280/1, BB/K016601/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. EPSRC [EP/I030395/1, EP/M013898/1, EP/J010588/1, EP/M015378/1, EP/P011306/1, EP/L000253/1, EP/M022609/1, EP/P022138/1, EP/N018591/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drug-target binding kinetics has recently emerged as a sometimes critical determinant of in vivo efficacy and toxicity. Its rational optimization to improve potency or reduce side effects of drugs is, however, extremely difficult. Molecular simulations can play a crucial role in identifying features and properties of small ligands and their protein targets affecting the binding kinetics, but significant challenges include the long time scales involved in (un)binding events and the limited accuracy of empirical atomistic force fields (lacking, e.g., changes in electronic polarization). In an effort to overcome these hurdles, we propose a method that combines state-of-the-art enhanced sampling simulations and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations at the BLYP/VDZ level to compute association free energy profiles and characterize the binding kinetics in terms of structure and dynamics of the transition state ensemble. We test our combined approach on the binding of the anticancer drug Imatinib to Src kinase, a well-characterized target for cancer therapy with a complex binding mechanism involving significant conformational changes. The results indicate significant changes in polarization along the binding pathways, which affect the predicted binding kinetics. This is likely to be of widespread importance in binding of ligands to protein targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据