4.7 Article

Benchmarking of Force Fields for Molecule-Membrane Interactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 4143-4151

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct500419b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [P208/12/G016]
  2. Operational Program Research and Development for Innovations-European Regional Development Fund [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0058]
  3. Operational Program Education for Competitiveness-European Social Fund [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0058]
  4. Palacky University [IGA_PrF_2014023]
  5. Conseil Regional du Limousin
  6. CALI (CAlcul en LImousin)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies of drugmembrane interactions witness an ever-growing interest, as penetration, accumulation, and positioning of drugs play a crucial role in drug delivery and metabolism in human body. Molecular dynamics simulations complement nicely experimental measurements and provide us with new insight into drug-membrane interactions; however, the quality of the theoretical data dramatically depends on the quality of the force field used. We calculated the free energy profiles of 11 molecules through a model dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) membrane bilayer using five force fields, namely Berger, Slipids, CHARMM36, GAFFlipids, and GROMOS 43A1-S3. For the sake of comparison, we also employed the semicontinuous tool COSMOmic. High correlation was observed between theoretical and experimental partition coefficients (log K). Partition coefficients calculated by all-atomic force fields (Slipids, CHARMM36, and GAFFlipids) and COSMOmic differed by less than 0.75 log units from the experiment and Slipids emerged as the best performing force field. This work provides the following recommendations (i) for a global, systematic and high throughput thermodynamic evaluations (e.g., log K) of drugs COSMOmic is a tool of choice due to low computational costs; (ii) for studies of the hydrophilic molecules CHARMM36 should be considered; and (iii) for studies of more complex systems, taking into account all pros and cons, Slipids is the force field of choice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据