4.7 Article

Generalized Energy-Based Fragmentation CCSD(T)-F12a Method and Application to the Relative Energies of Water Clusters (H2O)20

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 1546-1553

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct401060m

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21103086, 21333004]
  2. National Basic Research Program [2011CB808501]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110091120010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The generalized energy-based fragmentation (GEBF) approach has been implemented for the explicitly correlated F12a of coupled-cluster with the noniterative triples corrections [CCSD(T)-F12a] method for medium- and large-sized systems. By combining the canonical Hartree-Fock (HF) total energies and the GEBF-X correlation energies, the GEBF-X/HF method is illustrated to be more accurate than the origin GEBF-X method, where X could be any electron correlation method, such as second-order Moller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), MP2-F12, CCSD(T), and CCSD(T)-F12a. By combining the GEBF-X/HF results at the MP2-F12 and CCSD(T)-F12a levels, we can approximately achieve the CCSD(T) complete basis set (CBS) limit. Our test calculations for 10 low-energy isomers of water 20-mers show that for the relative energies of large water clusters, both the basis set and high-level electron correlation effects should be taken into account, in which the former is even more important. In addition, the GEBF-CCSD(T)/HF method at the CBS limit is used to evaluate 32 levels of density functional theory (DFT) methods. The results show that the DFT methods are difficult to predict the relative energies between the isomers of water 20-mers. The GEBF-CCSD(T)/HF method at the CBS limit is expected to be a benchmark for DFT and other electron correlation methods for medium- and large-sized systems with complex structures, in which both the basis set and electron correlation effects are important.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据