期刊
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 942-952出版社
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct4009766
关键词
-
资金
- Netherlands Research Council for Chemical Sciences (NWO/CW) through a VIDI grant
- Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
Two state-of-the-art simulation methods for computing adsorption properties in porous materials like zeolites and metal-organic frameworks are compared: the configurational bias Monte Carlo (CBMC) method and the recently proposed continuous fractional component Monte Carlo (CFCMC) method. We show that CFCMC is a very significant improvement over CBMC, and we can recommend it as our preferred method of choice. It is faster, more reliable, and (in contrast to CBMC) provides insight on whether or not the results are properly equilibrated. We also show that it is possible to combine the methods in a new CB/CFCMC hybrid method and derive the acceptance rules. This method achieves even higher insertion acceptance ratios.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据