4.7 Article

The Theory of Ultra-Coarse-Graining. 1. General Principles

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 2466-2480

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct4000444

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation through the Center for Multiscale Theory and Simulation [CHE-1136709]
  2. Division Of Chemistry
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1136709] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coarse-grained (CG) models provide a computationally efficient means to study biomolecular and other soft matter processes involving large numbers of atoms correlated over distance scales of many covalent bond lengths and long time scales. Variational methods based on information from simulations of finer-grained (e.g., all-atom) models, for example the multiscale coarse-graining (MS-CG) and relative entropy minimization methods, provide attractive tools for the systematic development of CG models. However, these methods have important drawbacks when used in the ultra-coarse-grained (UCG) regime, e.g, at a resolution level coarser or much coarser than one amino acid residue per effective CG particle in proteins. This is due to the possible existence of multiple metastable states within the CG sites for a given UCG model configuration. In this work, systematic variational UCG methods are presented that are specifically designed to CG entire protein domains and subdomains into single effective CG particles. This is accomplished by augmenting existing effective particle CG schemes to allow for discrete state transitions and configuration-dependent resolution. Additionally, certain conclusions of this work connect back to single-state force matching and open up new avenues for method development in that area These results provide a formal statistical mechanical basis for UCG methods related to force matching and relative entropy CG methods and suggest practical algorithms for constructing optimal approximate UCG models from fine-grained simulation data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据