4.7 Article

Establishing the Accuracy of Broadly Used Density Functionals in Describing Bulk Properties of Transition Metals

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 1631-1640

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct3010326

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish MICINN [FIS2008-02238, JCI-2010-06372]
  2. MINCECO [CTQ2012-30751]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009SGR1041, XRQTC]
  4. National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA)
  5. NANOTEC Center for the Design of Nanoscale Materials for Green Nanotechnology
  6. Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURD, the Commission on Higher Education, Ministry of Education (the National Research University Project of Thailand (NRU)
  7. Office of the Higher Education Commission, Thailand
  8. Spanish Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte [AP2009-3379]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of various commonly used density functionals is established by comparing calculated values of atomic structure data, cohesive energies, and bulk moduli of all transition metals to available experimental data. The functionals explored are the Ceperley-Alder (CA), Vosko-Wilk-Nussair (VWN) implementation of the Local Density Approximation (LDA); the Perdew-Wang (PW91) and Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) forms of the Generalized Gradient Approximation (GGA), and the RPBE and PBEsol modifications of PBE, aimed at better describing adsorption energies and bulk solid lattice properties, respectively. The present systematic study shows that PW91 and PBE consistently provide the smallest differences between the calculated and experimental values. Additional calculations of the (111) surface energy of several face centered cubic (fcc) transition metals reveal that LDA produces the most accurate results, while all other functionals significantly underestimate the experimental values. RPBE severely underestimates surface energy, which may be the origin for the reduced surface chemical activity and the better performance of RPBE describing adsorption energies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据