4.7 Article

Accurate Interaction Energies for Problematic Dispersion-Bound Complexes: Homogeneous Dimers of NCCN, P2, and PCCP

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 2842-2851

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct200374m

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1011360, CHE-0957317, EPS-0903787, CHE-0946869]
  2. Georgia Tech.
  3. Office Of The Director
  4. EPSCoR [903787] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All intermolecular interactions involve London dispersion forces. The accurate treatment of dispersion is essential for the computation of realistic interaction potentials. In general, the most reliable method for computing intermolecular interactions is coupled-duster singles and doubles with perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] in conjunction with a sufficiently flexible Gaussian atomic orbital basis set, a combination which is not routinely applicable due to its excessive Computational demands (CPU time, memory, storage). Recently, many theoretical methods have been developed that attempt to account for dispersion in a more efficient manner. It is well-known that dispersion interactions are more difficult to compute in some systems than others; for example, pi-pi dispersion is notoriously difficult, while alkane alkane dispersion is relatively simple to compute. In this work, numerous theoretical methods are tested for their ability to compute reliable interaction energies in particularly challenging systems, namely, the P-2, PCCP, and NCCN dimers. Symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) is applied to tilde dimers to demonstrate their sensitivity to the treatment of dispersion. Due to the small size of these systems, highly accurate CCSD(T) potential energy curves could be estimated at the complete basis set limit. Numerous theoretical methods are tested, against. the reliable CCSD(T) benchmarks. Methods using a treatment of dispersion that relies on time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) response functions are found to be the most reliable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据