4.7 Article

Optimizing Protein-Solvent Force Fields to Reproduce Intrinsic Conformational Preferences of Model Peptides

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 1220-1230

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct2000183

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [0344670]
  2. UC Berkeley CITRIS
  3. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05C11231]
  4. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0344670] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While most force field efforts in biomolecular simulation have focused on the parametrization of the protein, relatively little attention has been paid to the quality of the accompanying solvent model. These considerations are especially relevant for simulations of intrinsically disordered peptides and proteins, for which energy differences between conformations are small and interactions with water are enhanced. In this Work, we investigate the accuracy Of the AMBER ff99SB force field when combined with the standard TIP3P model or the more recent TIP4P-Ew water model, to generate conformational ensembles for disordered trialanine (Ala(3)), triglycine (Gly(3)), and trivaline (Val(3)) peptides. We find that the TIP4P-Ew water model yields significantly better agreement with experimentally measured scalar couplings-and therefore more accurate-conformational ensembles-for both Ala(3) and Gly(3). For Val(3), however, we find that the TIP3P and TIP4P-Ew ensembles are equivalent in: their performance. To further the e protein water force field combination and obtain more accurate. intririsic conformational preferences, we derive a straightforward perturbation to the phi' backbone dihedral potential that shifts the beta-PPII equilibrium. We find that the revised phi' backbone dihedral potential yields improved conformational ensembles for a variety of small peptides and maintains the stability of the globular ubiquitin protein in TIP4P-Ew water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据