4.7 Article

Assessing Excited State Methods by Adiabatic Excitation Energies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 2376-2386

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct200272b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center for Functional Nanostructures (CFN) of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [C3.9]
  2. Center of Chemical Innovation Chemistry at the Space-Time Limit (CaSTL) of the NSF [CHE-0802913]
  3. NSF [CHE-0909227]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [909227] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Chemistry [909227] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compile a 109-membered benchmark set of adiabatic excitation energies (AEEs) from high-resolution gas-phase experiments. Our data set includes a variety of organic chromophores with up to 46 atoms, radicals, and inorganic transition metal compounds. Many of the 91 molecules in our set are relevant to atmospheric chemistry, photovoltaics, photochemistry, and biology. The set samples valence, Rydberg, and ionic states of various spin multiplicities. As opposed to vertical excitation energies, AEEs are rigorously defined by energy differences of vibronic states, directly observable, and insensitive to errors in equilibrium structures. We supply optimized ground state and excited state structures, which allows fast and convenient evaluation of AEEs with two single-point energy calculations per system. We apply our benchmark set to assess the performance of time-dependent density functional theory using common semilocal functionals and the configuration interaction singles method. Hybrid functionals such as B3LYP and PBE0 yield the best results, with mean absolute errors around 0.3 eV. We also investigate basis set convergence and correlations between different methods and between the magnitude of the excited state relaxation energy and the AEE error. A smaller, 15-membered subset of AEEs is introduced and used to assess the correlated wave function methods CC2 and ADC(2). These methods improve upon hybrid TDDFT for systems with single-reference ground states but perform less well for radicals and small-gap transition metal compounds. None of the investigated methods reaches chemical accuracy of 0.05 eV in AEEs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据