4.7 Article

Modified Ehrenfest Formalism for Efficient Large-Scale ab initio Molecular Dynamics

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct800518j

关键词

-

资金

  1. DGA (Aragon Government, Spain) [E24/3]
  2. MEC (Spain) [FIS2007-65702-C02-01, IT-319-07]
  3. MEC/MICINN (Spain)European Community through NOE Nanoquanta [NMP4-CT-2004-500198]
  4. e-I3 ETSF [INFRA-2007-1.2.2, 211956]
  5. NANO-ERA Chemistry
  6. DNA-NANODEVICES [IST-2006-029192]
  7. SANES [NMP4-CT-2006-017310]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present in detail the recently derived ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) formalism [Alonso et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 096403], which due to its numerical properties, is ideal for simulating the dynamics of systems containing thousands of atoms. A major drawback of traditional AND methods is the necessity to enforce the orthogonalization of the wave functions, which can become the bottleneck for very large systems. Alternatively, one can handle the electron-ion dynamics within the Ehrenfest scheme where no explicit orthogonalization is necessary, however the time step is too small for practical applications. Here we preserve the desirable properties of Ehrenfest in a new scheme that allows for a considerable increase of the time step while keeping the system close to the Born-Oppenheimer surface. We show that the automatically enforced orthogonalization is of fundamental importance for large systems because not only it improves the scaling of the approach with the system size but it also allows for an additional very efficient parallelization level. In this work, we provide the formal details of the new method, describe its implementation, and present some applications to some test systems. Comparisons with the widely used Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics method are made, showing that the new approach is advantageous above a certain number of atoms in the system. The method is not tied to a particular wave function representation, making it suitable for inclusion in any AND software package.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据