4.7 Article

Water Dimer Cation: Density Functional Theory vs Ab Initio Theory

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct800506q

关键词

-

资金

  1. KOSEF [RII-2008-052-01000]
  2. Global Research Laboratory Project (KICOS)
  3. Korea Research Foundation [KRF-2006-353-CO0022]
  4. Korea Government (MOEHRD)
  5. ISTI Supercornputing Center [KSC-2007SOO-3005, KSC-2008-KO8-0002]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2008-0061956, 2009-00029] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By using density functional theory (DFT) and high-level ab initio theory, the structure, interaction energy, electronic property, and IR spectra of the water dimer cation [(H2O)(2)(+)] are investigated. Two previously reported structures of the water dimer cation [disproportionated ionic (Ion) structure and hydrazine-like (OO) structure] are compared. For the complete basis set (CBS) limit of coupled cluster theory with single, double, and perturbative triple excitations [CCSD(T)], the Ion structure is much more stable (by 11.7 kcal/mol). This indicates that the ionization of water clusters produce the hydronium cation moiety (H3O+) and the hydroxy radical. The transition barrier for the interconversion from the Ion/OO structure is similar to 15/similar to 9 kcal/mol. It is interesting to note that the calculation results of the water dimer cation vary seriously depending on calculation methods. Moller-Pleset second-order perturbation (MP2) theory gives reasonable relative energies in favor of the Ion structure but reports unreasonable frequencies for the 00 structure. On the other hand, most DFT calculations with various functionals overstabilize the 00 structure. However, the DFT results with MPW1K and BH&HLYP functionals are very close to the CCSD(T)/CBS results. Thus, as for the validity test of the DFT functionals for ionized molecular systems, the energy comparison of two water dimer cation structures would be a very important criterion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据