4.5 Article

Visible-light photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange over spherical activated carbon-supported and Er3+:YAlO3-doped TiO2 in a fluidized bed

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4391

关键词

upconversion luminescence agent; composite photocatalyst; liquid-solid fluidized bed; visible-light photocatalytic degradation; expansion ratio

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50908096]
  2. Science and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province, China [20130522073JH, 20140101159JC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDPowdered photocatalyst by doping TiO2 with upconversion luminescence agents achieved visible light induced photocatalysis. However, slurry photocatalysts are difficult to recover from the treated liquor. In the present study, spherical activated carbon (SAC)-supported and Er3+:YAlO3-doped visible-light responsive photocatalyst (Er3+:YAlO3/TiO2-SAC) was synthesized and characterized. The photocatalytic performance of photocatalyst was examined for degradation of methyl orange (MO) in a liquid-solid fluidized bed photoreactor under visible-light irradiation. RESULTSTwo notable UV emission peaks at 320 and 360nm were observed for Er3+:YAlO3 by visible light excitation, which were assigned to the transition of (P3/2I15/2)-P-2-I-4 and (D5/2I11/2)-D-4-I-4, respectively. An optimum 8h photodecolorization efficiency of 65.3% was obtained from the fluidized bed with reaction rate constant 22.17mgL(-1)h(-1). The degradation rate first increased and then decreased with the increasing expansion ratio, and the optimum expansion ratio was found to be 130%. CONCLUSIONOptical characterization revealed that Er3+:YAlO3 could convert incident visible-light to UV, which can then be utilized by TiO2 for photocatalysis. The visible light generated by Er3+:YAlO3 emissions were not used by TiO2 because of its high band gap. The photocatalytic degradation of MO in the fluidized bed photoreactor followed the Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetics model. (c) 2014 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据