4.5 Article

Heavy metals recovery from printed circuit board industry wastewater sludge by thermophilic bioleaching process

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4129

关键词

bioleaching; printed circuit board; sequencing batch reactor; thermophilic; wastewater sludge

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 94-2211-E-327 -002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDA large quantity of heavy metal contaminated wastewater sludge is produced during the treatment of printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturing wastewater. The PCB wastewater sludge containing high concentrations of heavy metals, such as Cu and Zn, increases the potential for metal recycling. Although bioleaching is indicated as a promising technology to remove metals from electronic scrap and waste PCBs, its application for metal recovery from PCB wastewater sludge is still very limited. The purpose of this study was to develop a thermophilic bioleaching process operated in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) to recover heavy metals from PCB wastewater sludge. RESULTSThe results show that an increase in sludge solid content from 0.5 to 5% (w/v) decreased the rate of pH reduction during the bioleaching process. It was also found that the efficiency and rate of metal solubilization decreased with increasing sludge solid content. At a sludge solid content of 0.5% (w/v), after four repeated feed/decant cycles with 10days per cycle (40days) of SBR operation, the maximum efficiencies of metal solubilization in the treated sludge were 65% and 100% for Cu and Zn, respectively. CONCLUSIONThe solubilization efficiency of heavy metals was lower during SBR operation with a longer 20-daycycle time. Therefore, a shorter 10-daycycle time for SBR operation is preferred for the thermophilic bioleaching of PCB wastewater sludge. In the treated sludge, the potential mobility and environmental risks of heavy metals were decreased significantly after the thermophilic bioleaching process. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据