4.7 Article

Carbon dioxide activation and dissociation on ceria (110): A density functional theory study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 138, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4773248

关键词

-

资金

  1. Consortium for Clean Coal Utilization at Washington University in St. Louis
  2. National Science Foundation [TG-CTS100011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ceria (CeO2) is a promising catalyst for the reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) to liquid fuels and commodity chemicals, in part because of its high oxygen storage capacity, yet the fundamentals of CO2 adsorption, activation, and reduction on ceria surfaces remain largely unknown. We use density functional theory, corrected for onsite Coulombic interactions (GGA+U), to explore various adsorption sites and configurations for CO2 on stoichiometric and reduced ceria (110), the latter with either an in-plane oxygen vacancy or a split oxygen vacancy. We find that CO2 adsorption on both reduced ceria (110) surfaces is thermodynamically favored over the corresponding adsorption on stoichiometric ceria (110), but the most stable adsorption configuration consists of CO2 adsorbed parallel to the reduced ceria (110) surface at a split oxygen vacancy. Structural changes in the CO2 molecule are also observed upon adsorption. At the split vacancy, the molecule bends out of plane to form a unidentate carbonate with the remaining oxygen anion at the surface; this is in stark contrast to the bridged carbonate observed for CO2 adsorption at the in-plane vacancy. Also, we analyze the pathways for CO2 conversion to CO on reduced ceria (110). The subtle difference in the energies of activation for the elementary steps suggest that CO2 dissociation is favored on the split vacancy, while the reverse process of CO oxidation may favor the formation of the in-plane vacancy. We thus show how the structure and properties of the ceria catalyst govern the mechanism of CO2 activation and reduction. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4773248]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据