4.7 Article

Microscopic theory of singlet exciton fission. II. Application to pentacene dimers and the role of superexchange

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 138, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4794427

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center for Re-Defining Photovoltaic Efficiency through Molecule Scale Control
  2. Energy Frontier Research Center
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001085]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  5. Department of Energy Office of Science Graduate Fellowship Program (DOE SCGF)
  6. ORISE-ORAU [DE-AC05-06OR23100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We apply our theoretical formalism for singlet exciton fission, introduced in the previous paper [T. C. Berkelbach, M. S. Hybertsen, and D. R. Reichman, J. Chem. Phys. 138, 114102 (2013)] to molecular dimers of pentacene, a widely studied material that exhibits singlet fission in the crystal phase. We address a longstanding theoretical issue, namely whether singlet fission proceeds via two sequential electron transfer steps mediated by charge-transfer states or via a direct two-electron transfer process. We find evidence for a superexchange mediated mechanism, whereby the fission process proceeds through virtual charge-transfer states which may be very high in energy. In particular, this mechanism predicts efficient singlet fission on the sub-picosecond timescale, in reasonable agreement with experiment. We investigate the role played by molecular vibrations in mediating relaxation and decoherence, finding that different physically reasonable forms for the bath relaxation function give similar results. We also examine the competing direct coupling mechanism and find it to yield fission rates slower in comparison with the superexchange mechanism for the dimer. We discuss implications for crystalline pentacene, including the limitations of the dimer model. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4794427]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据