4.7 Article

Geometric and electronic factors in the rational design of transition-metal-centered boron molecular wheels

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 138, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4798935

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR-0904034, CHE-1057746]
  2. Center for High Performance Computing at the University of Utah
  3. Division Of Chemistry
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1057746] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Materials Research
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [904034] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of the electronic and geometric factors on the global minimum structures of MB9- (M = V, Nb, Ta) are investigated using photoelectron spectroscopy and ab initio calculations. Photoelectron spectra are obtained for MB9- at two photon energies, and similar spectral features are observed for all three species. The structures for all clusters are established by global minima searches and confirmed by comparison of calculated and experimental vertical electron detachment energies. The VB9- cluster is shown to have a planar C-2v V (c) B-9(-) structure, whereas both NbB9- and TaB9- are shown to have C-s M (c) B-9(-) type structures with the central metal atom slightly out of plane. Theoretical calculations suggest that the V atom fits perfectly inside the B-9 ring forming a planar D-9h V (c) B-9(2-) structure, while the lower symmetry of V (c) B-9(-) is due to the Jahn-Teller effect. The Nb and Ta atoms are too large to fit in the B-9 ring, and they are squeezed out of the plane slightly even in the M (c) B-9(2-) dianions. Thus, even though all three M (c) B-9(2-) dianions fulfill the electronic design principle for the doubly aromatic molecular wheels, the geometric effect lowers the symmetry of the Nb and Ta clusters. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4798935]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据